Cancer Hospitals Study Yields 'Confusing' Findings
Asked how a hospital might be measured when the oncologist, radiation oncologist, and surgical oncologist perform separate functions in outpatient versus inpatient settings, Bilimoria says the system can be scored together in terms of "how well [members of the care team] work together.
"For example, how often do they hold tumor conferences and discuss the patient. That could be a measure of quality."
Problems with cancer treatment across the country are increasingly in public view. Last September, the Institute of Medicine's cancer report highlighted issues with lack of evidence-based care, inadequately credentialed providers, poorly tested regimens, and a tendency for oncologists to be less than honest
Bilimoria's research was supported by the ACS Clinical Scholars in Residence Program, the Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology and the American Cancer Society-Illinois.
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- How Top-Ranked MA Plans Earn Their Stars
- Readmissions: No Quick Fix to Costly Hospital Challenge
- How Hospitals Can Become 'Upstreamists'
- 4 Ways to Lower the Cost to Collect from Self-Pay Patients
- House Calls Key to Pioneer ACO Success
- How Telehealth Pays Off for Providers, Patients
- 4 Tips for Managing Employed Physicians
- WellPoint Dominates Nearly Half of Markets, AMA Says
- Defensive Medicine Still Prevalent Despite Tort Reform
- CMS Offers Some ACOs $114M for 'Upfront' Costs