Nurse Staffing Battle Rages On in Massachusetts
Adequate nurse staffing is no doubt critical to patient safety, and countless studies have linked it to everything from better outcomes to lower odds of being slapped with readmission penalties. But as I've pointed out before, mandated nurse staffing limits are not necessarily a silver bullet.
For example, a study published in the journal Health Services Research, found that although the California law succeeded in boosting nurse staffing, the staffing increase had only "mixed effects on quality." And researchers couldn't be certain whether any recorded quality improvements were actually caused by staffing changes.
Schildmeier says the MNA is confident that it will get the required number of signatures in its last round of signature gathering in order to get the staffing ratio issue on the November ballot. He also says that MNA's polling shows that more than 75% of the Massachusetts public supports this measure.
Whether it's a silver bullet or not, and whether it works to help patient safety or not, it looks like when November rolls around, it will be up to the public to decide.
Alexandra Wilson Pecci is a managing editor for HealthLeaders Media.
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Providers Prep for New Payment Models as Population Health Grows
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- 3 Ways to Rev Employee Development Programs
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- Aligning Executive Compensation with Provider Mission