Fees Lurk in Health Plans' Shift to e-Payments
Healthcare providers stand to benefit in several ways from the switch from paper-based payment to electronic payment, but not all e-payment models are created equal.
Healthcare payers portray the industry's historic shift to e-payments as a win-win proposition. But providers fear there may be a snake in the digital transfer Garden of Eden.
A 2012 Institute of Medicine report estimates annual waste in the healthcare system at about $750 billion, with paperwork and administrative bloating tallied at about $190 billion.
Aetna is among the health plan e-payment early adopters, moving at a fast pace to offer e-payment to all of the company's provider partners from hospitals to individual-practice doctors.
"Medicare began requiring electronic payment for all providers effective January 1, 2014. Many other health plans have instituted similar policies," says Jay Eisenstock, head of provider e-solutions at Aetna. "Given the groundswell throughout the industry, we expect the conversion will happen fairly rapidly."
Robert Tennant, senior policy adviser at the DC-based Medical Group Management Association, says e-payment is a welcomed innovation, particularly electronic fund transfers. "We've been asking for this—the provider community— for years," he said, noting the EFT payment model features "one-stop shopping for the provider."
EFT payments include a wealth of information to help providers match bills to individual patients, including tax identification numbers and a "trace" number for each patient billing transaction, Tennant said. "That's a huge leap forward for practices. It used to be manual."
- Federal Appeals Court Mulls Observation Status
- How One Health System Saved $3.5M in Benefits Costs
- How the Military's EHR Reboot Will Impact Interoperability
- HCA to Acquire CareNow Urgent Care Centers
- BCBS Tries New Drug Contracting Model
- 'Leadership Gap' Threatens MU Momentum, Says AMA
- Abington Health, Jefferson Health Plan '100% Equal' Merger
- Dental Board Case Before SCOTUS Has Far-Reaching Implications
- Ballot Initiative Pits Providers Against Payers in SD
- The Case for Recycling Surgical Supplies