Can University of Illinois Hospital Save Its Brand?
A decision by hospital leaders to participate in an advertising effort with an equipment vendor was intended to promote institutional expertise with robotic surgery. Instead it sparked an outcry among critics.
Despite the countless blog posts, tweets, and articles published about the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System's da Vinci advertisement controversy, I'm still left with one resounding question: How did so many high-ranking officials think featuring several physicians and staff in a medical device company-financed ad was a good idea?
To briefly recap, a full-page ad promoting da Vinci robotic surgery, and featuring a dozen U of I physicians and staff in white lab coats, ran in the January 19 issue of the New York Times Magazine. The hospital was not compensated by Intuitive, the medical device company that makes the da Vinci technology, for its staff members appearing in the ad, although several of its doctors had done consulting work for the company in the past. In fact, one surgeon received about $16,000 in the most recent one-year reporting period, the Chicago Tribune reported.
The hospital's decision to participate in the ad was intended to promote institutional expertise with robotic surgery. Instead it sparked an outcry among critics, none louder than former Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center CEO Paul Levy, who called the hospital's ethics into question in a series of blistering blog posts.
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives
- AMA Pushes Lame Duck Congress for SGR Repeal
- Medicare to Finally Pay Doctors for Care They Were Giving Away
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- Quality in Ambulatory Surgical Settings Gets a Closer Look
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- How Payers Are Curbing Behavioral-Health Cost Drivers
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative