Two-Midnight Rule Will Cost Hospitals Big
The simple demarcation between inpatient and outpatient status prodded by Medicare's proposed rule has the potential to turn into a big revenue problem. But good documentation can help.
The so-called "two midnight" rule has hospital and health system senior leaders extremely worried.
Although its enforcement by Medicare has been delayed a second time, hospitals and health systems still have to deal with it. In essence, the proposed rule calls on doctors, with the help of whatever decision-making staff the hospital has made available, to decide whether a patient is likely to need a stay in the hospital that extends over two midnights.
That essentially determines whether that patient, and his or her billing status, is designated as an inpatient or outpatient.
And that designation can mean a huge difference in reimbursement despite the fact that the inputs (bed occupancy, staff time) are largely the same. Some CFOs I've spoken with say reimbursement for outpatient status is as little as a third of what they would get for inpatient status.
Observation status has many implications for patients' pocketbooks as well, but that is a topic for another day. There are plenty of land mines, however, for hospitals and health systems in this simple demarcation between inpatient and outpatient status.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- A Fresh Look at End-of-Life Care