Leadership
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Hospital's 'No-Wait' Culture Slashes Costs

Philip Betbeze, for HealthLeaders Media, January 17, 2014

Medical equipment tagging is saving a New York hospital hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Its savings on patient tagging will be known soon. Next? The COO is considering employee tagging, to monitor hand washing and reduce infection rates.

Paul Milton sees his chief responsibility as chief operating officer of Ellis Medicine as trying to make the hospital and health system more efficient. It was not always that way, says Milton of his five-year tenure at the 438-bed community and teaching hospital system in New York's Capital region near Albany.

It's not hard to pinpoint when he shifted his attentions to efficiency.

It was 2008, when the health system merged two community hospitals driving heavy volume to the remaining facility's emergency department and general patient population.

"So we really had to get on our game because of the volume increase," he says.

Good thing, because that crisis provided the motivation to tackle bigger things later. Moreover, he says, Ellis caregivers had to get on their game because efficiency—in patient care, in wait times, in patient satisfaction—is an increasingly critical ingredient in the recipe for success, no matter where organizations are on the journey of replacing a volume strategy with a value one.

"We needed to do as good a job as possible to make sure the patient flow and length of stay and discharge worked really well," he says. Because Ellis Hospital had to take over ED services from the merged hospital that closed to inpatient care, volume increased dramatically—17 beds were added over the course of 90 days to the Ellis Hospital ED. Patient flow was the chief challenge in integrating the two into one.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Hospital's 'No-Wait' Culture Slashes Costs"


Michael Cylkowski (1/17/2014 at 1:12 PM)
Nice job of applying efficiencies but Taylorisms will only take you so far. What was the root problem? Nurses have to hunt down the equipment with their already precious little time so they secrete the equipment away in closets. Now that the available equipment is reduced by 22% they'll find another work-around like storing the free equipment next to the equipment being used. RFID cannot tell if something is actually in use or not; just turn it on and it'll be available when it is needed. The article ends with: "and also the patient will be safer." Reads like an afterthought!