NH Hospitals Brace for Lower Payments for Medicaid Patients

Robert N. Mitchell, for HealthLeaders Media , November 17, 2010

 A repayment formula approved this week by a New Hampshire legislative committee for uncompensated care may be too low to accurately reflect what hospitals in the state spend on uninsured and Medicaid patients. Nine community and inpatient acute rehabilitation hospitals in the state could lose more than $14 million in funding.

"That's simply wrong and will end up costing those of us with private insurance more through higher insurance premiums as those costs get shifted to cover these losses," the New Hampshire Hospital Association (NHHA) said. "This is an unfortunate outcome for hospitals, their patients and the communities they serve."

Some hospitals in the state that provide uncompensated care may receive Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) adjustment payments that are significantly lower, officials with NHHA said, after the state Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) approved a recommendation by the Joint Legislative Fiscal Committee to reformulate its repayment structure.

The move was a response to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which had questioned whether the state's process reflected the true uncompensated care costs being incurred by hospitals.

DSH adjustment payments, according to CMS, provide assistance to hospitals that serve a disproportionate number of poor patients. Hospitals receive an annual allotment to cover the costs of providing care to low-income patients who do not have other insurance, such as Medicare, Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program. The annual payment, established by the federal government, includes stipulations that DSH payments to individual hospitals must not exceed the uncompensated costs.

Historically, the state has put 100 percent of the federal matching dollars into the General Fund. "New Hampshire's DSH program was never really intended to do much more than use this federal money to help fund other parts of the state government and to balance the budget," the NHHA said.

The legislative committee's response to the federal directive may still mean funds are diverted to the state's General Fund to support other programs, not uncompensated care, NHHA President Steve Ahnen, said. And, the committee's approval may still face some challenges, he noted, "but as the Health and Human Services Commissioner said [Tuesday], the state needs to find a way to fix this on a long-term basis."

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

2 comments on "NH Hospitals Brace for Lower Payments for Medicaid Patients"

John (11/17/2010 at 4:22 PM)
Thank you Steven. Lowe's had been faced with huge costs with their benefit plan. Continuing to shoulder the cost shift from Medicare, Medicaid and now even more with Kathleen Sebelius and Barack Obamacare was just unsustainable. They are delighted with the early results from the Cleveland Clinic are looking ahead at contracting with private Joint Commission Accredited hospitals outside of the US. Fortunately they don't cost shift.

Steven Watkins (11/17/2010 at 9:05 AM)
This quote: "...will end up costing those of us with private insurance more through higher insurance premiums as those costs get shifted to cover these losses," the New Hampshire Hospital Association said." is where the fallacy lies. Hospital executives in NH (Live Free of Die? Hmmm) and across America continue to incorrectly assume that employers will shoulder this cost-shift. Party's over, folks. Have you not read what the Lowes Corp did with the Cleveland Clinic?




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.