The Joint Commission has released the 2010 National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG), announcing to the field a significant reduction in the number of requirements from the 2009 NPSGs.
The 2010 NPSGs for hospitals contain 11 requirements, down from 20 in the 2009 (the nine missing goals have not been removed; they are now regular standards instead.) There are no new NPSGs, although NPSGs 07.03.01, 07.04.01, and 07.05.01—which were phase-in goals during 2009 about preventing multiple drug-resistant organisms, central line-associated bloodstream infections, and surgical site infections—are now expected to be fully implemented and facilities will have to comply with them as of January 1, 2010. Additionally, many of the existing NPSGs contain significant changes for 2010.
"I really applaud the Joint Commission on making the changes they have," says Elizabeth Di Giacomo-Geffers, RN, MPH, CSHA, a healthcare consultant in Trabuco Canyon, CA, and former Joint Commission surveyor. "My perception is the NPSG are less prescriptive, clearer, and more manageable."
Medication reconciliation, NPSG 8, remains up in the air and a field review of the proposed revisions to the Goal are expected in the spring of 2010. The Joint Commission announced earlier this year that it would no longer cite facilities for failing to comply with NPSG 8 to "reduce the burden" on hospitals, although the Joint Commission has not removed the expectation that organizations comply with the Goal, which is still evaluated but "not scored" during surveys.
Some of the changes included in the 2010 NPSGs are effective immediately. These include any deleted requirements. Specifically, surveyors will not evaluate the following elements of performance for the remainder of 2009 (from the 2009 NPSGs):
Additionally, NPSG.07.02.01, which required organizations to consider a healthcare-acquired infection a sentinel event, was deleted because it was already covered in the sentinel event policy, and also will not be surveyed for the rest of 2009.
According to the October issue of Perspectives, the official newsletter of The Joint Commission, the requirements that were removed from the NPSGs and placed in the standards were done so to clarify where efforts should be spent. Once a requirement is moved to the standards, there's less of a need to spotlight the issue and less emphasis will be placed on it during survey.
Those 2009 requirements moved to the standards include: