Proposed MU Rules Draw Strong Reaction

Margaret Dick Tocknell, for HealthLeaders Media , May 9, 2012

More than 270 interested parties filed public comments regarding the Meaningful Use Stage 2 proposed rules, but it is a few paragraphs in the 68-page comment letter from the American Hospital Association (AHA) that has drawn the attention and ire of patient and consumer advocate groups.

Citing HIPAA concerns, the AHA disagrees with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services proposal "to provide patients with the ability to view, download, and transmit large volumes of protected health information via the Internet."

It also terms as "too aggressive" the proposal that electronic information about a hospital admission be available within 36 hours of discharge for at least 50% of the patients. In addition, the AHA questions the authority of CMS to require that 10 percent of all discharged patients view, download or transmit to a third party their information during the reporting period for meaningful use.

Public reaction to the AHA's comments was blunt:

  • Deven McGraw, a lawyer and director of the Health Privacy Project at the Center for Democracy and Technology, said in this blog post that "getting patients critical information about their hospital stay could have an impact on their ability to recover. Patients should expect hospitals to be their partners in healthcare—but in no partnership that I'm aware of does one side get to hoard all of the relevant information."
  • Daniel Z. Sands, MD, president of the Society for Participatory Medicine, which represents both clinicians and patients, made this press statement: "Patient engagement is the cornerstone of a successful, cost effective, and high-quality health care system. Those goals cannot be achieved unless we give patients access to their own health information and encourage them to use it."
  • Columnist e-Patient Dave at suggested that the AHA had declared war on patient empowerment.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Proposed MU Rules Draw Strong Reaction"

Jim (5/9/2012 at 10:21 AM)
It seems to me that patient access to records should be via an HIE. The HIE should be able to aggregate records from all providers and provide a single consistent point of access for the patient. Also, if a large percentage of patients are going to access their records on-line how many people will we need to hire to man a help desk to reset credentials, provide help, and I can only imaging the number of questions in interpreting the results. Now, this may be a good thing for some patients, but it is going to be expensive and will certainly expose many patients PHI to the wrong parties.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.