For years healthcare leaders have been evaluated by means of a "Does Not Meet/Meets/Exceeds" scale. Subjective in nature, this type of assessment does not really indicate what the leader has accomplished. A far more fair method is the use of a clear, objective, and weighted evaluation based on specific goal achievement.
The evaluation makes use of a one-to-five rating system for each goal. A rating of one is assigned when a leader has fallen below target, while two means partial goal achievement. Three denotes the goal was met. The leader who gets a rating of four surpassed the goal, while one who merits a five significantly exceeded expectations.
Further, each goal is assigned a weight—a percentage—based on its importance. One goal might be allocated 40 percentage points because of its significance to the organization, while another might be set at 15 percentage points due to its lesser priority. As a result, when leaders consider the assigned weights (all of which add up to 100%), they know where to put the most energy.
Goals—which should be attainable yet challenging for the leadership ranks—are typically set around key focus areas often referred to as pillars. Typically these operational dimensions are Service, People, Quality, Finance and Growth.
However, initial implementation of this leader evaluation system can be challenging for some organizations. The good news is that missteps they make can be fixed with an understanding of what went wrong. Here are the top 10 most common mistakes made during the first year of rollout and how they can be handled.
Common Mistake No. 1: Inappropriately assigning organization-wide goals to middle managers
Every hospital's senior leadership team will have a goal around making more money than it spends. Goals to improve net income or boost the operating margin typically appear under the Finance Pillar of the chief executive officer and other senior leaders. Subsequently these same targets are cascaded down through the leadership ranks. However, a middle manager such as a patient care supervisor will not affect senior financial goals. Instead, it makes far more sense to hold middle supervisors accountable for managing expenses or other fiscal concerns which they can control.
Another example of this mistake occurs when an organization assigns its overall patient satisfaction goal to middle managers who have nothing to do with direct patient care. Take the accounting department, for instance, which is not a part of the patient satisfaction survey. The goal instead, for that department, should not be patient oriented, but rather directed at internal customer satisfaction. Its middle managers should be rated by those who are supported by accounting.
Common Mistake No. 2: Goals are over- or under-valued in their assigned weight
Why does this happen? Sometimes leaders are too quick to assign weights, and fail to make a connection between the importance of the weight with what's being measured. The more significant the goal is to the organization's success, the higher its weight should be.
For some leaders, though, the temptation is too great to put smaller weights on things they know will be challenging; and conversely associate higher weights with easy to accomplish goals. Patient satisfaction is often a high priority in many hospitals. However if a patient care leader gives it a weight of 10% or less, nurses on that unit are not going to make it a main concern. Yet this happens when a unit is struggling to attain good service results.
Common Mistake No. 3: All leaders share the same weights for a goal, even when their responsibilities don't affect the weights.
It's common for an organization to expect its leaders to have a goal around a budget target, especially during these rough economic times. Let's say the CEO decides that meeting financial goals should be a priority for all leaders. So he mandates that everyone must adhere to their budget and assigns that target a weight of 25%. In addition, he says that everyone will have a productivity goal which is also weighted at 25%.
While this modification might make sense for many leaders, what about those whose responsibilities involve minimal financial oversight? Take, for instance, a quality management leader with a staff of three salaried individuals and little funding for supplies or other expenses. She has hardly any fiscal responsibilities, yet 50% of her evaluation revolves around finance. Her main responsibility is quality, which was assigned a mere weight of 15%. Essentially, the CEO has handed that leader a high performance evaluation on a silver plate. Meanwhile, the manager with a staff of 30 caregivers struggles mightily to cope with the high weights attached to budget compliance and productivity metrics.
Common Mistake No. 4: Instead of the outcomes, tactics such as projects or processes are used as goals
Suppose a nurse leader sets a goal of being on time with completion of employee evaluations. This is a tactic that will result in meeting the real goal of reducing staff turnover. Timely evaluations help raise the satisfaction level of employees, meaning they are less likely to leave the organization. The leader would have been far better served by setting an objective, measurable goal of reducing department turnover or improving results on the next employee satisfaction survey. Still another example of this mistake in a clinical setting is staff's compliance with hand washing policy. Yet this is actually a tactic to achieve the goal of reducing infections such as MRSA.
Common Mistake No. 5: Making healthcare regulations goals when they're really expectations
Most hospitals have achieved certification by The Joint Commission, yet some want to put this certification as a goal under the Quality Pillar. In actuality, hospital leadership and direct reports should be living an accreditation lifestyle. Patients and their family members expect a safe healthcare experience. Likewise, occupational safety goals appear under the quality leader's pillar when adherence to OSHA regulations should be standard performance rather than a goal. After all, healthcare workers presuppose that an organization will provide a secure environment in which to work.
Common Mistake No. 6: Some leaders fail to accept responsibility for far-reaching organizational goals they directly affect.
Any leader who has influence over whether or not an organization-wide objective is achieved should own the goal. For instance, the marketing department's role is to help grow the hospital's volume. So it makes sense that the marketing leader should have hospital volume goals under the Growth Pillar.