Security Concerns Won't Go Away

Scott Mace, for HealthLeaders Media , January 21, 2014

"If you don't take it down, and we do have a major event, or a major issue, I think that the harm of that will be ten times worse than if you were to actually take it down and take care of the site and put it back up and have it work properly," McMillan says.

Since's much-publicized problems began, critics have pointed consistently to Silicon Valley-powered sites such as Amazon and Google as evidence that large sites can scale securely. And yet, Target's very real recent woes point out that has no monopoly on bad Web site execution.

I pointed out to McMillan that the many articles we've read about bringing high-tech security experts to the rescue rarely, if ever, mention the real possibility that health insurance companies could themselves be great resources to assist and address its security and performance issues.

"They stand to benefit from this, right?" McMillan replied. "You would think they would want this to work."

Perhaps, and I have no evidence to support this, governments keep the insurers from lending their help for fear that once insurers get their hands on the code running, they might try to tilt that code to bestow ever-so-subtle preference to that insurer.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.