Healthcare Unions Eye Gains in 2014

John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media , December 16, 2013

"Look for NLRB go back to the rulemaking and look for expedited elections," Trivisonno says. "That is the biggest concern that employers should have. When you get a petition you have to communicate as an employer the implications and consequences of unionization. If you only have 10 to 14 days to communicate your message to thousands of people, it is going to be extremely difficult, particularly because you can't shut the place down with healthcare. We have had situations with six months and barely prevailed. I don't know how we are going to do it in two weeks."

In addition, the NLRB will review dozens of decisions it made from 2008 to 2010 when the board contained only two members owing to Republican objections to Obama's candidates. The U.S. Supreme Court in Process Steel vs. the NLRB in 2010 ruled that the two-member NLRB did not have the authority to decide cases, so many of those cases will be reviewed again by the five-member board.

With the current pro-labor makeup on the full board, Trivisonno says "there are a bunch of cases lined up that they are waiting to hear and they will overturn previously decided cases and change the way the pendulum swings."

While much of what happens at the federal level is beyond the control of most hospital executives and administrators, Trivisonno says steps can be taken to deflect union organizing efforts. It starts with being proactive and communicating your hospital's stance on organized labor and why you oppose it.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Healthcare Unions Eye Gains in 2014"

Robin Wright, RT(R) (12/21/2013 at 2:37 AM)
I find this article offensive, simply stated. The infantilisation of unions┬┤ presumed motives for "resistance to change" in Mr. Trivisonno's simplistic conception is misguided and unhelpful. Unions have a role that is unique in helping businesses successfully navigate change and grow market share. The inclusion of IRI Consultants┬┤ comments in the absence of a counter argument from labor itself (SEIU in point of fact has been an "industry leader" in developing these sorts of mutually beneficial partnerships), does a disservice to readers.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.