U.S. News & World Report Names Top Hospitals

John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media , July 17, 2013

"The problem is there are a number of awards given out to hospitals. There is Health Grades and U.S. News, and LeapFrog [Group] and Consumer Reports and they don't always match with one another," says Charles Ornstein, senior reporter at ProPublica, the nonprofit news organization, and president of the board of the Association of Health Care Journalists.

"Oftentimes they strongly disagree with one another and there are a number of cases where they recognize hospitals that are in serious violation of federal and state regulations related to quality of care. It is a concern that there is such a proliferation of rankings that they have almost become hard to decipher."

Ornstein says the U.S. News rankings in particular present "a great marketing tool for hospitals that are recognized."

"It is a name consumers recognize. And hospitals are looking for independent validation of their quality. So, this is something which, even though they may criticize the methods and especially criticize it if their ratings go down, they definitely want to make the list of top hospitals in their area or in the country," he says.

Ornstein says he is troubled that none of the various "rating schemes" use state and federal inspection data in their rankings.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "U.S. News & World Report Names Top Hospitals"

gary glissman (7/17/2013 at 5:20 PM)
This rating system is rigged and not reflective of true quality performance. It also helps explain why consumers have so much difficulty getting real data to do any really meningful comparisons. This report is simply a popularity contest. We have to demand more.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.