Healthcare Quality Metrics 'Abysmal,' Senate Panel Hears

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , July 2, 2013

Christine Cassel, MD, president and CEO of the National Quality Forum, which reviews and endorses quality measures that are the basis for federal and private payment adjustments, added that while there are some examples of decisive improvement, "there's not nearly enough of them."

She said measures need to be "more understandable for consumers and policy makers" and they must be coordinated so public and private payers use the same measures, which they largely do not do today.

"One of the reasons that the employers can't get the information they need [is that] private insurance companies often use different measures or proprietary measures [than federal payers]."

More needs to be done, she said. For starters, considerable funding, specifically for developing quality measures was authorized by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, but has not yet been appropriated by Congress. That money could help develop the kind of measures consumers, and to a great extent providers, want.  

"It doesn't just happen by snapping your fingers" and to date, smart people are trying to do the job with "a hodgepodge of support," she said.

"The bottom line is that mistakes, poor care, and complications hurt people and increase costs to workers, families, business and taxpayers. We can and must do better…"

Committee chairman Sen. Max Baucus, (D-MT) called the hearing, entitled "The Path Forward," as a kind of "gut check" to examine the problems in measuring quality going forward as the PPACA changes the way providers are paid. He agreed that with so many multiple measures computed in different ways, there's confusion about who's providing good care.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

2 comments on "Healthcare Quality Metrics 'Abysmal,' Senate Panel Hears"

Peter (7/4/2013 at 9:06 AM)
Sadly, we're an industry ecosystem that is still largely disconnected and pointing fingers at each other. Without de-humanizing care or de-valuing healthcare professionals, we need to accept that "healthcare" is a supply chain that is, for the first time, getting wired for optimization. Consumers need to be accountable for their health (and costs). Doctors need to care about outcomes and health not visits and billing. Everyone will make EMRs and their affiliate systems (PACS, VNA... Etc.). become more useful and effective when they understand the supply chain of health and how to improve. Then again, I don't even know my blood pressure... So I'll start with me.

Harvey (7/2/2013 at 10:48 AM)
Patients are not always compliant, are they taking the correct meds, are they staying on their restricted diet, have they really stopped smoking, are they keeping their specialist appointments etc.Quality is not a one way street. Congress also decided to let free enterprise have free reign over EMR's and now millions of dollars and an enormous amount of resources are being wasted trying to get EMR's to communicate with each other. Physicians are wasting valuable resources and money chasing after specialist trying to get their patients consults. EMR is a wonderful tool unfortunately American business tainted it and it will take years and years to deliver the product that it should and can be.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.