'Last Shot' for Embattled Exeter Hospital

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , November 29, 2012

Kiss of Death
CMS almost never takes the egregious step of denying a hospital's ability to receive payment for Medicare and Medicaid patients, which for most facilities represents so much money that it would be the kiss of death. But a read of the latest document may explain why regulatory agencies are having such a tough time with this small rural hospital.

Even though the so-called serial infector David Kwiatkowski, who faces charges from the U.S. Attorney's Office that he obtained controlled substances by fraud and tampering with a consumer product, has been terminated from hospital employment, a lax hospital culture that allowed his behavior to occur apparently remains.

Exeter failed to have an "effective governing body." It failed to keep drugs and biologicals secure, and its staff lacked full knowledge relating to the security of its drug access system, according to the report. The hospital failed to maintain secure access to the emergency department.

Infection control is biggest issue
But it is Exeter's basic infection control issues that are the biggest remaining concern, Martin says.

In August, another survey document detailed Exeter's failure to establish policies and procedures to prevent workers with open wounds from being near patients. One employee, subsequently identified as Kwiatkowski, was on several occasions seen to be working with "open lesions."

The latest report doesn’t mention that. But it does detail that the hospital failed to set up a hospital-wide infection control program and failed to ensure that infection control practices were followed on three out of four units. Inspectors observed personnel not following infectious disease protocols.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "'Last Shot' for Embattled Exeter Hospital"

Lisa Karakostas (11/30/2012 at 12:38 AM)
I suggest you do more research and tell the truth instead of writing such a biased, one sided, inflammatory, and misleading story. It is reprehensible you did not do due diligence prior to writing what amounts to nothing more than a tabloid type sensational piece of writing designed purely to discredit a health care organization that has been in existence for over 100 years and has repeatedly received accreditation and high quality marks from numerous regulatory agencies.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.