Why Healthcare Costs Trillions Less in Canada

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , November 15, 2012

Here's what they found:

  1. Between 1980 and 2009, Medicare spending per beneficiary in the U.S. rose from $1,215 to $9,446, which was a 198% increase after adjusting for inflation. But in Canada, comparable spending rose from $2,141 to $9,292, or an inflation-adjusted rate of 73%. Think of it this way: for every $10 spent on services in the U.S., Canada spent $3.36.
  2. In Canada, government healthcare spending paid for a greater offering of benefits (which is why Canada's 1980 spending was higher than that in America), covering 80% of total healthcare costs for seniors. In the United States, Medicare pays for about 50% of seniors' healthcare expenses.
  3. If Medicare costs had risen at Canada's pace, projected savings would have totaled $154.2 billion in 2009 and $2.156 trillion from 1980 to 2009.

I know what you're thinking. These two idealists are notorious and unrepentant single-payer advocates who founded Physicians for a National Health Program. But like it or not, these are the numbers they got.

Woolhandler and Himmelstein also point out that quality of care apparently has not suffered in Canada because of its parsimony.

"Life expectancy at age 65 years is longer and has grown faster in Canada than in the United States since 1980... offering reassurance that cost control has not compromised quality," they wrote. "A meta-analysis suggests that clinical outcomes are, if anything, better than for insured Americans."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

12 comments on "Why Healthcare Costs Trillions Less in Canada"

Dan Ross (11/26/2012 at 4:31 PM)
On a population basis this study appears right on. Notice the study makes no comparison of the survival time for Canadian citizens afflicted with serious disease? A better question may be, if one diagnosed with advanced ?? and covered by Medicare would he/she chose the medical expertise of Canada or the US? In Florida our hospitals enjoy a booming business of Canadians traveling for advanced medical treatments. How long does a patient in the Canadian national system have to wait for a MRI when their GP suspects possible brain cancer? In the UK it's 3 months. In the US 3-4 days? Other countries are cheaper for the reasons highlighted in the study but additionally due to the R word, rationing!

Sue (11/21/2012 at 10:47 AM)
this artical is false, misleading and a joke

emil cici (11/19/2012 at 7:40 PM)
When was the last time the Canadian System developed a major surgical or device break thru? Why do Canadians cross over the border into the US for surgical procedures.Including the Canadian Prime Minister? When was the last time a Canadian Company developed a major drug that significantly impacted a disease entity?




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2015 a division of BLR All rights reserved.