Physicians' Stance on Nurse Practitioners is Dangerous

Alexandra Wilson Pecci, for HealthLeaders Media , September 25, 2012

She says she finds such a position odd, considering that so many AAFP members "work in practices that depend very heavily on nurse practitioners to provide primary care."

Personal anecdote time: I've been going to the same primary care practice for many years, and I have seen the supervising physician exactly once. I have never felt like my healthcare was compromised. My three-year-old daughter, who has several complex medical issues, most often sees an NP for her primary care visits.

When something has been outside their scope of expertise, every one of them—without hesitation—has referred my daughter or me to the proper specialist.  Of course they do. That's the function of primary care.

So, why would the AAFP suggest otherwise? I wouldn't expect my primary care physician or the PA that I usually (and prefer) to see to perform surgery, and I trust any member of our care team to make appropriate referrals.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

3 comments on "Physicians' Stance on Nurse Practitioners is Dangerous"

Katherine Katen Moore (1/1/2013 at 11:50 AM)
excellent comments both. What is the big deal? if MDs are so well educated, why waste that on the mundane and the routine? NPs and nurses (not as familiar with PAs, sorry) are trained to work in the daily milieu...

jsilver (9/28/2012 at 8:41 AM)
Let's be honest here. There has been a dramatic shift in the politics of the AMA. They have become increasingly hostile to sharing primary care, and it appears this corelates well with their shift to the right politically. I think this is becauise they have many physicians who do not support them, which allows the ideologues to rise to the top. I remember when the scientific comittee of the AMA recommended decriminalization of pot! Where is the MD outrage against poverty, war, or the increasing challenge to things like planned parenthood? MD's have become a self interested group and have forgotten their obligations to the public. It might surprise the AMA to find out how much we could accomplish together, if they could just get off their high horse and remember what we are here for.

Gus Geraci (9/26/2012 at 1:06 PM)
I don't see a suggestion of two classes of care, I see a highlighting of the fact that CRNP's (and PA's) are not as highly trained as physicians. Absolutely CRNP's and PA's should be allowed to practice to the top of their training, just as Family Physicians and Primary Care Internists and Pediatricisns should practice to the top of theirs. Primary Care Physicians should not have to see "routine" stuff. They should see the more difficult and complicated primary care problems, thus saving time for non primary care specialists to see the stuff they NEED to see, not the mildly difficult but the really difficult. It's time to stop throwing insults, and really work as a team. Let everyone work to the top of their licenses, and the entire system will benefit.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.