7 Ways the PPACA Hurts Safety Net Hospitals

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , July 19, 2012

In an interview with HealthLeaders Media last week, Bruce Siegel, MD, President and CEO of the National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems, described the impact as "a disaster for the safety net and a disaster for patients.  You can have a safety net for public hospitals or you can have Medicaid coverage, one or the other, but what's happening is that we are walking away from both."

7. Greater risk of infection
Under the new law, hospitals with higher rates of healthcare-associated infections will receive another downward payment adjustment. This, too, could disadvantage those low-income patients' hospitals that are older and have double rather than single-bed rooms.

"I don't want to suggest that safety net hospitals cause more infections," Katz says. "I just know that any place that doesn't have single rooms has higher rates of infections. And disproportionately, safety net hospitals are more likely to have double or quadruple rooms."

Bottom line
The bottom line, Katz says, is that the ACA's rules are telling his hospitals "we're going to compare you relative to your peer group, even though your peer group is not really equal to you" with hurtful payment reductions that are premature.

Far better, he suggests, is a "carrot and stick" approach that would push hospitals to set up improvement targets that challenged hospitals could strive to reach. "I have no problem with the idea that if you can't demonstrate improvement, payment is withheld. But I don't like pretending that all hospitals have these burdens and should be rated against each other. They don't."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

2 comments on "7 Ways the PPACA Hurts Safety Net Hospitals"

Bulldog (7/20/2012 at 9:19 PM)
1) Unless Republican governors choose to give away Medicaid funds in order to score political points, PPACA is a huge boon for safety net hospitals. Higher reporting requirements are annoying, certainly, as are reward payments that may not capture the challenges of being a safety net hospital, but drastically increased insurance rates are a massive bonus to hospitals that currently provide so much uncompensated care. 2) Mr. Plemmons: I defy you to describe one specific way in which PPACA is a "massive government takeover." Does Medicare not paying for readmissions constitute a takeover? Having insurers compete in state-based exchanges a takeover?

Patrick Plemmons (7/19/2012 at 3:40 PM)
Gee, who knew that a massive government takeover of the healthcare system could have unintended consequences? Someone should alert the AHA, CHA and all the other organizations that sold their constituents down the river in return for more volume. Volume, by the way, that will be under reimbursed, but I guess that was unintended too.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.