Medicaid Ruling Creates Major Budgeting Problem

Karen Minich-Pourshadi, for HealthLeaders Media , July 2, 2012

These two parts of the ACA, had they remained intact, would have positively influenced the bad debt and charity care at many hospitals and health systems.

But when the courts ruled that the federal government may not monetarily punish states that refuse to expand Medicaid eligibility, it took the teeth out of the legislation, says Michael Freed, executive vice president and CFO at Spectrum Health, a nine-hospital system in western Michigan with nearly 9,000 beds, and president and CEO of Priority Health, the system's health plan with over 600,000 covered lives.

"I imagine most providers came away from this [ruling] thinking they were going to do okay—the worst-case scenario from this is they will get the same amount of Medicaid as they planned for. But how this will play out actually gets very hard to predict," says Freed.

With the door open for states to opt out of Medicaid expansion, it's anyone's guess what will happen in each state, he says. If a state opts out, it would cause residents who fall in the 100%-133% poverty range to seek subsidies for private insurance, which is fully funded by the federal government. However, having to pay for their own insurance may lead many individuals to hold off on getting coverage until it's absolutely necessary.

"If there's no enforcement of the insurance mandate, I can envision people waiting until they are very sick to purchase insurance [through an exchange], and that will drive up the insurance costs and make that insurance pool price very high," he says.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

2 comments on "Medicaid Ruling Creates Major Budgeting Problem"

David Andrews (7/3/2012 at 9:32 AM)
This article makes a good point. Michigan is faced with covering another 1 million people under expanded Medicaid. I suppose this could be done if the prisons are closed and school funding is cut. Hospitals are covering these people now as a write-off very expensively with no preventive health. Will hospitals start paying the Medicaid premiums to offset the write-offs?

S Harbaugh (7/2/2012 at 3:07 PM)
I am completely amazed that we have so many healthcare "leaders" looking at the issue of Obamacare from a completely myopic, selfish viewpoint of how their individual organizations will benefit or not benefit from the law! What about the concept of Constitutional limitations on federal power? What about the loss of individual liberty? At the end of the day, hospitals are going to saddled with even more federal regulations, reporting requirements, and mandates. No state that is governed by competent leaders is going to willingly sign-up for an expansion of Medicaid when they cannot accurately forecast the increased cost, in addition to having to pay 90% of these costs after 3 years. Rather than being homers for the current administration and not wanting to rock the boat, the AMA and HFMA might want to re-focus their energies on standing up for what is right, rather than for what is expedient.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2015 a division of BLR All rights reserved.