AHA: Leapfrog 'Manipulated' Data Related to Safety Scores

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , June 28, 2012

3. Significant errors in the Leapfrog's data

The AHA says in its letter that Leapfrog has made significant mistakes that have resulted in "misleading information being publicly displayed." For example, at least one specialty hospital was given a score when the survey's stated methodology excluded specialty hospitals. Furthermore, the AHA says it found several hospitals that should have qualified for a score but weren't graded.

Binder replied that all 2,600+ hospitals that were scored received a copy of the source data used in calculating their scores as well as the methodology five weeks before the score became public. "We have corrected the handful of errors reported to us, but the vast majority of what we have reported has been substantiated and stands as originally reported."

For hospitals that weren't scored, and which Umbdenstock maintains should have been, "this is typically because they did not provide enough publicly available data to meet our criteria," Binder explained.

Of Umbdenstock's charge that Leapfrog manipulated the data, Binder said it "suggests you are expressing something beyond sincere concerns about the methodology. So to be clear on the issue of 'manipulation of data': disappointing though many of these grades may be to many of your member hospitals, Leapfrog...did not make these scores up. The Hospital Safety Score grades reflect real problems threatening the lives of people who depend on America's hospitals.  We urge you to address those problems quickly."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "AHA: Leapfrog 'Manipulated' Data"

MedicalQuack (6/28/2012 at 10:48 AM)
I said not too long ago, time for the ratings game to stop and not only Leapfrog but all of it as we need to move on. Ok to have a comparison list to show what every hospital offers as far as services for sure so consumers can drill down and find what they need, but the ratings part of it I think has kind of passed it's time of being useful as we move forward, and you can't rely on all the data today as flawed data is creeping in there as well. I found it 2 years ago with my former doctor, who had been dead for 8 years still listed as being alive and taking new patients:) Here's my 2 cents on the topic, let's move on. http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2012/06/healthgrades-puts-out-top-hospital.html




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.