AMA, AHA at Odds Over 'Surprise' Medicare Final Rule

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , June 18, 2012

The medical staff must be specific to each hospital, he wrote, to serve "as a vital resource for real-time clinical feedback regarding what does and does not work.  For these efforts to be successful, it is essential that a locally organized medical staff oversee care delivery and provide a primary perspective regarding how that hospital's care coordination efforts are working for that local patient population."

Governing boards
Umbdenstock says that CMS' new requirement that each hospital's governing body must include at least one medical staff member caught the AHA by surprise as well because it was not in the proposed rule, violating the Administrative Procedure Act.

If it had been in the proposed rule, CMS would have heard five essential reasons why many hospitals can't comply.

  1. Since governing boards of many hospitals are elected, those hospitals "would not meet the requirement unless a physician decides to run for the hospital's board/commission and is successful in that campaign."
  2. Publicly owned hospitals may have trustees whose members are appointed by the county council or another elected official, and are limited to choosing "individuals who best fulfill the fiduciary responsibilities for these important public hospitals."
  3. In some states, such as Iowa, the law specifically prohibits a person or a spouse of a person with medical or special staff privileges" from serving as a trustee.
  4. Public university boards of regents serve as governing boards of university hospitals.
  5. Investor owned hospitals have governing boards selected by their investors, and it's "not appropriate for an agency to interfere with the choices made by investors in a privately held company."
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

4 comments on "AMA, AHA at Odds Over 'Surprise' Medicare Final Rule"

Kay Bauer (6/19/2012 at 9:17 PM)
To myself as a patient have heard grumbles from a couple of my well respected physicians and I feel there are too many outsiders on hospital boards that really do not grasp the scope of what they are trying to do. I feel we need more physicians overseeing Hospitals as they understand what patients need much more than an outsider on the board. Physicians deal daily with patient illnesses and problems. Patients are starting to get frustrated with hearing these grumblings but I see why after reading this article.

Li (6/19/2012 at 8:38 AM)
First thing that came to mind: I think there will be a lot of educational loans not being paid if the docs can't 'moonlight' at different hospitals the way they do.

SteveA (6/18/2012 at 7:30 PM)
So if a multi-hospital system keeps a single governing board, but must have individual medical staffs, that would mean each hospital gets to send one doctor to the governing board. Imagine that - gasp ! - there would be local physician representation on the governing board ! Does anyone know whether it would be the medical staff who gets to select whom to send, or would the governing board get to pick the doctor they want? - A huge difference between those two scenarios.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.