Leapfrog Issues Hospital Safety Report Cards

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , June 6, 2012

However, hospitals that got Cs were somewhat more likely to have a medical intensive care unit, less likely to be a member of a hospital system, and more likely to be a hospital receiving disproportionate share funds than hospitals receiving a grade of A or B.  Grade A hospitals had a slightly better nurse-to-patient ratio than those hospitals that received Bs or Cs.

Binder explains that the letter grades were designed around the initiative that began years ago in Los Angeles "where the public health departments inspect restaurants and give them a grade, and the restaurants are required to post that grade in their windows." 

Studies indicate that more than 60% of customers consult a restaurant's grade before eating there, Binder says "And If people look at a grade as a safety indicator before going to eat in a restaurant, wouldn't they also look at a grade as a safety indicator before going to a hospital, which is clearly more important?"

Several patient safety experts across the country say that such a score is sorely needed to help patients make decisions, especially where to go if they need to have surgery.

"I would hesitate before going to a C hospital if there was an A hospital that was equally convenient and I had equal confidence in the doctor," says  Robert Wachter, MD, another member of the Leapfrog advisory panel and a national patient safety expert at the University of California San Francisco.

Wachter notes that though 12 years have passed since the Institute of Medicine's groundbreaking report, "To Err Is Human," highlighted the shockingly high numbers of deaths and unintended consequences due to hospital errors, "it's still difficult for a patient, a family member or a clinician to determine if a hospital is truly safe."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Leapfrog Issues Hospital Safety Report Cards"

Robert Finney PhD (6/6/2012 at 12:17 PM)
Patient Safety for Dummies Doctors "gamble" with patients' lives, but don't let the patient in on the bet. All the emphasis on communication apparently excludes the patient from the requirement of informed consent in making all medical decisions, which is a legal requirement. HMOs and medical groups are obsessed with protecting doctors from the consequences of medical errors. Kaiser Permanente really does gamble with patients' lives, including rewarding schedulers for not giving patients appointments, drive-thru deliveries, lying to kidney transplant patients, allowing social workers to prescribe drugs without psychiatrists' permission, failure to report sexual molestation of women patients... and most recently leaving a towel inside a patient. In the Permanente Journal (Kaiser's own publication), a Kaiser patient safety doctor admits that the health plan is the third party in the exam room, controlling the doctor-patient relationship, including the relationship between patient safety and cost to the health plan. Original investigations posted on www.hmohardball.com Robert Finney PhD




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.