Proposed MU Rules Draw Strong Reaction

Margaret Dick Tocknell, for HealthLeaders Media , May 9, 2012

Physicians, University of Utah:
"Epic, Cerner, and all major vendors make it absolutely impossible for physicians to bring in outside tools to measure Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). This is a real problem… if we are ever going to be able to measure value. Meaningful use must require open access to all EHRs from the vendors. We need to be able to integrate outside tools such as the NIH PROMIS system in the flow of patient care using EHRs."

Cincinnati Children' Hospital Medical Center:
"While a number of pediatric measures were added this year, most of the new measures are only related to very specific specialties. Based on the measures presented, a large number of our providers would still have zero denominators when reporting for Stage 2. We are requesting additional pediatric measures be added as well as the exclusion for patients 18 years and older."

Pacific Orthotics & Prosthetics (California):
"This new look-back period would certainly be the last straw. I am a small business owner competing with corporations that have far more resources. If I have to worry for 10 years that someone may request money back, I will certainly close my shop. … Stop burdening a much-needed industry and look somewhere else for money. The orthotics and prosthetics industry should not be lumped in with the durable medical equipment industry.

Larry Preston, Professional Medical Consultants, Las Vegas
"Providing office visit summaries in 24 hours will actually harm the patient in the some cases, since we will not have time to include lab and other diagnostic tests that were ordered on that visit. The current requirement of 72 hours at least allows for those tests to be documented in the physician's notes prior to sending to the patient."

See Also:

Climbing the Meaningful Use Mountain


Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Proposed MU Rules Draw Strong Reaction"

Jim (5/9/2012 at 10:21 AM)
It seems to me that patient access to records should be via an HIE. The HIE should be able to aggregate records from all providers and provide a single consistent point of access for the patient. Also, if a large percentage of patients are going to access their records on-line how many people will we need to hire to man a help desk to reset credentials, provide help, and I can only imaging the number of questions in interpreting the results. Now, this may be a good thing for some patients, but it is going to be expensive and will certainly expose many patients PHI to the wrong parties.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.