20% of Healthcare Dollars Spent on 1% of Population

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , January 12, 2012

In 2009, 1% of the nation's civilian population required healthcare spending that was slightly greater than in 2008, an increase from 20.2% to 21.8% of $1.26 trillion in treatment dollars, according to the latest Statistical Brief from the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

That indicates that more than $1 in every $5 healthcare dollars went to treat one out of every 100 people. The annual mean expenditure was $90,061 for those in that 1%.

But over time, there has been "some decrease in this concentration at the upper tail of the expenditure distribution," according to AHRQ research experts, Steven B. Cohen and William Yu. In the 1996 version of this report, 1% of the population accounted for 28% of the total healthcare expenditures.

The periodic brief captures trend information that helps planners identify the biggest drivers of healthcare costs "and the characteristics of the individuals who incur them," the brief says.

The top 5% accounted for half of all healthcare expenditures, indicating that focusing on that segment may yield the biggest savings. On the other hand, according to the report, the bottom 50% of the U.S. population, those requiring the lowest amounts of healthcare spending, accounted for only 2.9% of healthcare dollars in 2009 and 3.1% in 2008. And those in the top 50% of the population accounted for 97% of all healthcare expenditures.

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "20% of Healthcare Dollars Spent on 1% of Population"

Don Stumpp (1/13/2012 at 10:27 AM)
First, I will admit I didnt thoroughly read the report. When this started being played on the news, my thought was - what is the point? Insurance is meant to spread risk. There are catastrophic health events for a small percentage of people. That will always be there. So a very limited number of people will have the highest cost. We are not all going to spend evenly. If we did, then we wouldnt need insurance. And hopefully health care providers already know to focus on the top spending conditions like cancer or cardiac. Unfortunately, maybe the focus has been on using resources to delay the inevitable and hence the enormous cost for the 1%. But to 'blame' the 1% - which hopefully people won't due based on this report, is absurd. IMHO




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2015 a division of BLR All rights reserved.