What Would Super Committee Say About $430M Proton Beam Center War?

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , November 3, 2011

And, Medicare regional contractors could become even stingier down the line, declining coverage for other cancer sites if a few years hence, they determine proton therapy isn't as good as the next new thing.

There's always something to worry about with coverage," says Arzt. "CMS is a roller coaster; from year to year one does not know how it's going to turn out."

UCSD's Department of Radiation Oncology chair Arno J. Mundt, MD, did not respond to a request for comment. But a UCSD spokeswoman released a brief statement saying the university "remains dedicated to providing proton therapy as one of the necessary tools a comprehensive cancer center should have in its arsenal." She referred to last year's press release, which explains UCSD is partnering with Proton Health Partners of San Diego to build "one of the strongest proton center treatment teams in the nation."

Proton beam therapy aims radiation beams from a 6 by 9 foot cyclotron to accelerate protons that zap certain tumors. This nuclear-reactor look-alike, with the weight of a loaded 737 jet, has an aggressive precision that some experts say is far more effective than other cancer treatments.

It is said to result in fewer side effects and cause less damage to healthy tissue than other radiation techniques, as well as non-radiation treatment options like surgery in certain patients. And treatment is an outpatient procedure, taking no more than about 20 minutes.

While the technology is not new, experience is limited but three more proton beam centers are under development in Somerset, NJ, Seattle, and Flint, MI. The oldest, which began in 1990 and is the only facility west of Oklahoma City, is just 95 miles north of San Diego at Loma Linda University.

Van Gorder acknowledges that proton beam is a somewhat risky venture. Candidly, he says, there's probably not enough demand for 3,500 patients in a county of only 3.5 million.

Patients may have to be brought in from across the country.

"Are there enough patients in San Diego for two proton beam therapy center sites? No," Van Gorder says. "Are there enough patients for one site? Maybe. It's all about whether or not the patients can come, and from how far." The closest facilities beyond Loma Linda are in Houston at M.D. Anderson, in Oklahoma City at the ProCure Proton Therapy Center and in Chicago at the CDH Proton Center.

A. Brent Eastman, MD, Scripps Chief Medical Officer and president-elect of the American College of Surgeons, acknowledges that comparative effectiveness of proton beam therapy is largely uncharted territory. That's why Scripps, which treats the bulk of the region's cancer patients, wants to use proton beam as a research tool, "one arrow in our quiver," to look at longer term outcomes compared with other cancer treatments.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

3 comments on "What Would Super Committee Say About $430M Proton Beam Center War?"

SneakyBooger (11/12/2011 at 7:12 AM)
It's a waste of tax payer money. 80% of the patients being treated at these proton centers will be prostate cancer patients. PROTONS HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN TO BE ANY MORE CURATIVE THAN OTHER MODERN RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENTS; NOR ARE THERE ANY LESS SIDE EFFECTS. See the NCCN guidelines for prostate cancer at WWW.NCCN.ORG.

Mike Van Doren (11/4/2011 at 10:40 AM)
Cheryl Clark's article superbly exposes the myopic decision-making in health care by "rational individuals" who can then play opossum to the maladies, both human and financial, wrought by their decisions because they were not held accountable in the first place. Without better controls there will continue to be too many such examples of people attempting to have their cake and eat it too, without consideration of who's to pay for the cake in the first place.

Leonard Arzt (11/3/2011 at 4:06 PM)
It is ironic that on the day after the writer, Cheryl Clark, and I talked, Medicare published its 2012 proton therapy reimbursement rates, announcing a 15% bump in finalized proton therapy hospital-based rates. It also called attention to "relative stability"in determining next year's rates. This often sets the standard followed by regional Medicare carriers. So for next year, at least, the roller coaster ride remains smooth,and stable.As well as providing greater access for cancer patients nationwide. Leonard Arzt, National Association for Proton Therapy




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2015 a division of BLR All rights reserved.