Surgical Survival Predictors May Be Next Big Quality Metric

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , May 19, 2011

Expectedly, many hospitals aren't ready to volunteer this information. It's controversial, Binder acknowledges. It's embarrassing for some hospitals that don't do as well as their competitors. Hospital and physician groups have balked.

Despite rock-solid scientific evidence supporting the listing of these scores, the National Quality Forum has endorsed survival calculations for just three the six procedures: pancreatic resection, esophageal resection, and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. So far they've declined to endorse the other three, but Binder thinks they will be eventually.

"There is no measure that has ever gone through the scrutiny and the scientific requirements that these measures went through in the NQF process," Binder told me.

Many more surgical procedures and other high-risk types of hospital procedures will get the same level of scrutiny.

As Binder travels the country speaking to many hospital leaders, she says she's struck by how many non-Leapfrog participants still have their heads in the proverbial sand about transparency, still refusing to release their data.

"A lot of them are hunkering down thinking they can hide this, at least until the value-based purchasing (scores) are made public. They aren't focused at all on this. And I think that couldn't be a worse strategy."

I asked why she thinks hospitals are reluctant. "They think transparency is a problem because so many measures 'can be misinterpreted' that kind of thing," she answers. "But my statement to them is that no measures are perfect. They need to be transparent because that's how they're going to survive."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

2 comments on "Surgical Survival Predictors May Be Next Big Quality Metric"

John Rosenstock (5/24/2011 at 9:32 AM)
I would include gastric bypass surgery in the list as the mortaility rates can be very high at some hospitals.

Catherine Smith (5/20/2011 at 4:17 PM)
Healthcare transparency is a good idea in an ideal world. I am grateful to be able to look at publicly reported data and be able to determine what facility has the better outcomes, morbidity, and mortality rates in order to promote positive patient outcomes and consumer choice.However, the idea that the consumer actually has the ability to choose a top 10 percentile hospital is not reality. The reality is...the insurance carrier dictates what provider you choose. If the top 10 percentile facility is not in the insurance network then there is no choice. Unless a person is indigent, on Medicare, or independently wealthy.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2015 a division of BLR All rights reserved.