Medical Imaging War Pits Doctor vs. Doctor

Joe Cantlupe, for HealthLeaders Media , February 10, 2011

Self-referral has been a stormy issue nationally for years. In its recent decision, Maryland’s highest court affirmed a 2007 decision by a lower court prohibiting the self-referral of patients. The Maryland State Board of Physicians had not taken a position on the issue regarding MRI machines and other equipment until 2006.

The American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons has been following the case closely as it unfolded over three years ago. In 2007, the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons filed an amicus brief in the case, along with the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American Urological Association and the American College of Surgeons.

 “There is a very significant health care policy discussion to happen here, …it’s wrong,” says attorney Howard Rubin, who represented a dozen practioners, emergency medicine doctors, and urologists involved in the case, says of the Maryland high court’s decision. “It shuts down ability of a patient where to get their scans.” 

“The heart of our healthcare policy is moving toward integrated systems,” he adds, “as opposed to fragmented, created silos. It’s a question of trust.” But there are doctors who don’t trust the motives of other doctors. Laura I. Thevenot, CEO of the American Society for Radiation Oncology says that the ruling preserved strong patient protection against abusive physician self-referrals.

“Today’s ruling represents a victory for patients in Maryland,” she says. “We hope this decision will jump start congressional action to ensure that all Americans can make independent treatment decisions based on quality care, not perverse financial incentives.”

1 | 2 | 3

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Medical Imaging War Pits Doctor vs. Doctor"

joe (2/15/2011 at 11:00 AM)
the key to affordable, quality, integrated care is to take the profit motive OUT of health care, along with the greedy, unnecessary insurance companies and do what's best for the patients, and cover ALL Americans with basic health care at a lower cost...Canada does it well and for about 60% of the cost in US, per person...if we could take the slimy politicians and corporate whores out of the equation then it would work here too!




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2015 a division of BLR All rights reserved.