Rates of Early Elective Births 'Disturbing,' Says Watchdog Group

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , January 28, 2011

"Even a mature fetal lung test before 39 weeks in the absence of appropriate clinical circumstances is not an indication for delivery," Fleischman said. "Healthcare professionals and patients must continue to make those hard clinical choices while they remember that critical development occurs to a baby's brain, lungs, liver and other organs during the last weeks of pregnancy (and) one-third of fetal brain development occurs in the last five weeks of pregnancy.

"And there are significant increased problems for babies born just a few weeks early (such as) neonatal intensive care unit admissions, feeding problems, jaundice, inability to hold temperature, and tremendous increased costs. Every week counts."

Asked why medically unnecessary inductions are increasing, and why there is so much variability across the nation, Fleischman said that a "perfect storm" has increased the occurrence.

  • First, often the mother is at the end of her pregnancy and feels that she's had enough.
  • Second, the doctor wishes "for convenience to schedule his or her life...we have a much more interventionist practice these days....Obstetricians are in fact pretty anxious to deliver babies early."
  • And third, women have misperceptions about the safety of earlier birth. According to a 2009 report, Fleischman said, one in four women believe that 34 to 36 weeks is full term and another 50% think 37-38 weeks is full term. "75% got it wrong. A true full term is 39-40 weeks and women think there are no medical complications for early delivery."

The Leapfrog report asked hospitals to submit the percentage of inductions and Cesarean sections between the 37th and the 39th week. These elective early procedures were classified as non-medically necessary if they were not done for any of the several dozen justifiable exclusions specified by the National Quality Forum, such as the women in labor had hypertension or diabetes or multiple gestation.

The Leapfrog Group suggests this web site as a resource for providers who want more information on guidance for the appropriateness of early induction procedures.

The site lists several reasons women are given for why they should have early induction that are not supported by rigorous research. Those reasons include:

  • ·        Preterm pre-labor rupture of the membranes
  • ·        Twin pregnancy
  • ·        Gestational diabetes requiring insulin
  • ·        Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) at term and
  • ·        Oligohydramnios (too little amniotic fluid).

Asked why Leapfrog Group is targeting hospitals and not specifically physicians who perform the procedures, Binder replied that physicians are "key caregivers when these deliveries are scheduled to o early and obviously they have a critical role in that happening."

1 | 2 | 3

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Rates of Early Elective Births 'Disturbing,' Says Watchdog Group"

Anna Plak, RN (1/28/2011 at 1:08 PM)
How do you do a report on preterm deliveries and not talk to ANY of the people that are getting it right or to any of the doctors that deal with the complexities of taking care of pregnant women. Does Cheryl Clark expect us to believe that the patient population at UCLA Reagan is the same as the one at Riverside Community? Why only tell half of the story and bend it to be half true - and half untrue. Cheryl Clark shows here that she has no grasp of the topic. Based on this reading, i doubt that she has a grasp of ANYTHING in health care. Time to hang it up, Cheryl.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.