Health Insurers Gird for MLR Changes

Jeff Elliott, for HealthLeaders Media , December 1, 2010

"Their current [MLR] requirements are much lower than the new 80% rule, so they will not be able to achieve this overnight," said Jinn-Feng Lin, director and actuary, Global Human Resource Services, PricewaterhouseCoopers. "They will likely take action to reconstruct their commission structure or even to get out of this line of business."

Brokers can earn 20% to 30% in first-year commissions, which represents a huge administrative expense, making it impossible for many carriers to comply with the minimum 80% MLR rule in the short term. "They are hoping for transitional relief that will take them into 2014," according to Lin, who noted that the MLR rules include how states can request wavers from HHS on behalf of their carriers.

The MLR rules also could mean big changes self-funded, employer-sponsored plans that rely on insurers to administer their policies, Lin said. "Although self-funded plans are not part of the MLR requirements, it might change the way they operate."

For instance, health plan call centers that offer nonclinical assistance to their members are considered an administrative expense, which may incite insurers to drop this service across the board.

Aside from some notable anomalies—some carriers are abandoning health lines and others are consolidating to take advantage of economies of scale in a more restricted operating environment?the health insurance industry will remain largely intact and operating with the goal of making a profit. Until 2014, that is, when the full force of ACA will be felt by health plans. What the industry will resemble then is anyone's guess. Stay tuned ...

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

2 comments on "Health Insurers Gird for MLR Changes"

Chloe (12/29/2010 at 8:43 PM)
Hello?!!! Where have you been Barium?? Doctors have been living with far worse than anything health plans face, for years. Try being told how much you can charge, who you can charge, what services you can offer, where you can offer them, AND live under the constant threat that you might inadvertently neglect to collect a co-pay on grandma, and be subject to criminal sanctions. Tough isn't it?

barium (12/2/2010 at 10:56 AM)
Hello? Do we realize what is happening here? How would American businesspeople react if THEY were told their businesses would be audited by the federal government, and that they would be required by law to refund to their clients any revenue over a 20% administrative expense? And if they exceeded 20% in any product line and lost money, oh, well, I guess that's tough. What? Here we are, frogs sitting in a pot of cold water on the stove, falling asleep until we become froglegs. Does anyone else out there recognize the dangerous precedent being set here? What are we going to do about it?




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2015 a division of BLR All rights reserved.