Rapid Response Teams No Substitute for Wrong Bed Assignment

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media , September 23, 2010

"During these times, everything goes wrong, ambulances are diverted, patients are boarded in emergency departments, patients are often prematurely discharged from the ICU to make room for more ill patients or elective surgical cases, nurses are overloaded and stressed and patient discharges take place prematurely, resulting in patient readmissions.

"On days like these, hospital clinicians and managers face an unlikable dilemma, to admit a patient to a nonpreferred unit or to board the patient in the emergency department or the postanesthesia care unit until a bed in the preferred unit becomes available.

"During these times," they continued, "proper placement is an exercise in wishful thinking and the definition of a preferred bed becomes 'the one that is available.'"

In an interview, Litvak said, "We put patients wherever there is a hole. We're not in the position to put the right patient in the right bed."

They added that the benefits of such teams, also called "Code Blue" teams, have not been proven. "RRT studies were often of poor quality and clinicians often failed to call an RRT when they should have, leading to uncertainty in the estimates of benefit."

"It seems perverse to measure the success of RRTs by counting the number of saved lives that were put at risk by triage errors, driven by ineffective management of patient flow," they wrote.

The concept of rapid response teams was developed decades ago in Australia, but it was greatly advanced in the U.S. by new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services director Don Berwick, MD, then president and CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. IHI made rapid response teams one of the seven safety strategies in its "100,000 Lives Campaign" in 2005.

1 | 2 | 3

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Rapid Response Teams No Substitute for Wrong Bed Assignment"

S. Bork (10/3/2010 at 7:21 PM)
Sorry but this assessment is way off base. Rapid response teams have no basis in development from a bed shortage issue and I assume the gentlemen's response came from poor institutional guidelines or failing bed management at Hopkins. Many patients have been averted a downturn in their condition due to quick response (Rapid Response Teams) by care givers, and some cases families who noticed that "something was not right". Maybe a post op bleed from a low risk lap procedure, or a medication reaction from a new antibiotic.[INVALID]neither requiring an ICU bed. Poor bed management should be a problem of the past. Proper policies and procedures, best practices, skilled personnel and other practices all but eliminate disastrous bed back ups. I suggest JAMA tend to less destructive articles criticizing processes that work great, head off disastrous situations, and are excellent tools in empowering staff, patients and families to raise the quality of healthcare delivered in thousands of hospitals across america.




FREE e-Newsletters Join the Council Subscribe to HL magazine


100 Winners Circle Suite 300
Brentwood, TN 37027


About | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Reprints/Permissions | Contact
© HealthLeaders Media 2016 a division of BLR All rights reserved.